Quick Andhra in Association with News9: Ajatashatru, the second ruler of the Haryanka dynasty of Magadha, is a figure shrouded in controversy and mystery. He ruled from 492 BC to 460 BC and is known for his violent ascension to the throne, where he reportedly seized power from his own father, King Bimbisara.
Historians generally agree that Ajatashatru deposed Bimbisara by force, but the exact nature of his father's demise remains a subject of debate. According to some accounts, Ajatashatru imprisoned Bimbisara and eventually ordered his death, while others suggest that Bimbisara took his own life while in captivity.
Jain and Buddhist texts present a somewhat different interpretation of these events. According to these sources, Bimbisara voluntarily entered into confinement at the request of his son, in order to prevent a succession crisis. However, after being imprisoned for several years, he eventually succumbed to his injuries and died.
It is worth noting that these versions of events may have been influenced by political and ideological considerations. Jainism and Buddhism were both growing in influence during this period, and it is possible that their proponents sought to cast Ajatashatru in a more favorable light by downplaying his role in his father's death.
Despite the controversy surrounding his rise to power, Ajatashatru is remembered as an important patron of Buddhism and Jainism. He organized the first Buddhist Council at Rajgir in 483 BC, where major Buddhist texts like the Sutta-Pitaka and Vinaya Pitaka were compiled by Ananda and Upali. Ajatashatru was reportedly deeply interested in Buddhism and invited the famous monk Mahakashyapa to Magadha, where he later became his chief disciple.
However, Ajatashatru's reign was not without its challenges. He faced repeated incursions by the neighboring kingdom of Kosala, which led to a prolonged and bloody conflict. In the later years of his reign, he was reportedly betrayed by his own son, Udayabhadra, who murdered him and assumed the throne.
Despite these challenges, Ajatashatru is remembered as a significant figure in the history of Magadha and the development of Buddhism and Jainism. His complex legacy reminds us of the complex and multifaceted nature of historical figures, and the importance of approaching history with an open mind and a critical perspective.Mahapadma Nanda was a controversial figure in the history of ancient India, who rose to power by allegedly killing his step-brothers in a brutal war of succession. He was the founder of the Nanda dynasty of Magadha, which ruled from approximately 343 BCE to 321 BCE.
According to some accounts, Mahapadma Nanda was the illegitimate son of Mahanandin, the last king of the Shishunaga dynasty of Magadha. He had long harbored ambitions to rule the kingdom himself, and after his father's death, he launched a ruthless campaign to eliminate his half-brothers and consolidate his power.
Under Mahapadma Nanda's rule, the city of Pataliputra (now known as Patna, Bihar) became the capital of Magadha, and he is credited with expanding the kingdom's territory through conquest and diplomacy. However, his reign was also marked by corruption and cruelty, and he was notorious for his use of secret police and spies to maintain his hold on power.
Despite his military prowess and political savvy, Mahapadma Nanda's reign was ultimately cut short by a young Brahmin scholar named Chanakya. Chanakya is said to have been outraged by the Nanda dynasty's oppression and corruption, and he began plotting to overthrow the ruling family and establish a new dynasty in its place.
With the help of a young warrior named Chandragupta Maurya, Chanakya orchestrated a successful revolt against the Nandas, culminating in the Battle of Pataliputra in 321 BCE. After their victory, Chandragupta Maurya was crowned king of Magadha, founding the Mauryan dynasty and ushering in a new era of Indian history.
The legacy of Mahapadma Nanda remains a subject of debate among historians and scholars. Some view him as a ruthless tyrant who ruled through fear and intimidation, while others see him as a visionary leader who played a key role in the expansion and consolidation of Magadha's power. Regardless of one's opinion of him, there is no denying the impact that Mahapadma Nanda had on the history of ancient India, and his reign serves as a cautionary tale of the dangers of unchecked ambition and political violence.Emperor Ashoka, also known as Ashoka the Great, is one of the most famous and revered rulers in Indian history. However, his rise to power was marred by violence and bloodshed, as he is said to have murdered his own siblings in order to seize the Mauryan throne.
According to historians and Buddhist texts, Ashoka was the third son of King Bindusara, and was not the obvious heir to the throne. To secure his position, he allegedly launched a brutal war of succession that lasted for over a decade, and resulted in the deaths of his 99 brothers.
It is said that Ashoka's ascension to the throne was aided by Radhagupta, a minister of Bindusara who helped him in the fratricidal struggle. With the support of his loyal followers, Ashoka emerged victorious and became the king of Magadha.
However, Ashoka's thirst for power did not end with the elimination of his rivals. In 261 BCE, he launched a campaign of conquest against the kingdom of Kalinga (now known as Odisha), which resulted in one of the bloodiest battles in Indian history.
According to historians, Ashoka's armies butchered over 300,000 people in the battle of Kalinga, and the whole region was mercilessly plundered and destroyed for days. This experience had a profound impact on Ashoka, who was said to be filled with remorse and guilt over the loss of life and destruction he had caused.
It is said that Ashoka then renounced wars and violence, and turned to Buddhism for solace and guidance. He is credited with promoting Buddhist ideals of nonviolence, compassion, and social welfare throughout his empire, and he built many monuments and institutions to support these ideals.
Ashoka's legacy continues to inspire people to this day, and he is revered as a symbol of peace and enlightenment. However, the dark history of his rise to power and his brutal conquests should not be forgotten, as they serve as a cautionary reminder of the dangers of unchecked ambition and violence.Chandragupta II, popularly known as Vikramaditya, was a powerful ruler of the Gupta dynasty who ascended the throne in 380 CE. However, his rise to power was not without controversy and bloodshed.
According to the Devichandraguptam, a play written by the famous poet Kalidas, Chandragupta II killed his own elder brother Ramagupta to claim the throne. Ramagupta's widow, Dhruvadevi, then became Chandragupta's queen. This act of violence has been debated by historians, with some questioning its veracity.
According to some accounts, Ramagupta was a weak ruler who was incapable of defending the kingdom from foreign invasions. It is believed that he was captured by the Saka rulers, and that Chandragupta II took over the reins of the empire in his absence. However, when Ramagupta returned, Chandragupta II feared that he would lose the throne, and so he had his brother killed.
Chandragupta II was known for his military prowess and is said to have conquered many neighboring kingdoms. The Udayagiri cave inscriptions in Madhya Pradesh, which date back to his reign, boast of his military achievements. The inscriptions claim that he "bought the earth, paying for it with his prowess, and reduced the other kings to the status of slaves". This suggests that he was a formidable conqueror who was able to assert his dominance over many other rulers.
Despite his violent ascension to the throne, Chandragupta II is remembered as one of the greatest rulers of the Gupta dynasty. Under his rule, the empire experienced a period of peace and prosperity, and he was known for his patronage of the arts and sciences. He is said to have been a great scholar himself and is credited with the authorship of the treatise "Arthashastra".
Chandragupta II's reign is considered to be the golden age of the Gupta dynasty. His patronage of the arts and sciences led to a flowering of culture, and his military conquests expanded the empire's borders. Despite the controversy surrounding his rise to power, his legacy is one of great achievements and contributions to Indian history.Throughout history, the quest for power has led to some of the most gruesome acts of violence and family murders in politics. Power-hungry individuals, blinded by ambition, have resorted to killing their own family members to gain or retain their hold on power.
From ancient times to modern-day politics, the lust for power has proven to be a double-edged sword. In India, several powerful emperors and kings killed their own family members to seize the throne or retain their grip on power. Ajatashatru, Mahapadma Nanda, Ashoka, and Chandragupta Vikramaditya are just a few examples.
But the problem is not limited to India. In fact, political family murders are a common occurrence in many countries. From the Roman Empire to modern-day Africa, the desire for power has resulted in the murder of close family members.
One of the most infamous examples of political family murder in modern times is the case of Saddam Hussein, the former dictator of Iraq. Saddam had his own cousin, Ali Hassan al-Majid, executed for plotting against him. He also ordered the deaths of his sons-in-law, who had defected to Jordan and spoke out against his regime.
In North Korea, the ruling Kim family has a long history of political family murders. Kim Jong-un, the current dictator of North Korea, is believed to have ordered the execution of his uncle Jang Song-thaek, who was once considered the second-most powerful figure in the country.
In the United States, the Kennedy family is also no stranger to political family murders. President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in 1963, and his brother Robert Kennedy was assassinated in 1968 while running for president.
The tragic reality is that political family murders are often carried out without any sense of remorse or guilt. The perpetrators are so consumed by their thirst for power that they will stop at nothing to achieve their goals, even if it means killing their own flesh and blood.
In many cases, these murders are covered up or justified as necessary for the greater good of the country or the ruling party. But the truth is that there can be no justification for taking the life of one's own family member in the pursuit of power.
Political family murders are a dark stain on the history of humanity. They serve as a warning that the lust for power can lead to the most heinous of crimes, and that we must always be vigilant in protecting the values of justice, democracy, and human rights. Only by holding those in power accountable for their actions can we hope to prevent the tragedy of political family murders from repeating itself in the future.
Share on WhatsApp